- IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 WINDOWS 10
- IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 PRO
- IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 PC
Would it better to use IXT as external editor? Which technique is better? Since I already have all the RAF files in LR 6. I found that even the low setting produces what I perceive as excessively over-sharpened images.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 WINDOWS 10
I used this on my AMD based desktop system (FX 8350 processor, 990FX chipset, 32 GB ram, r7 370 video card, Windows 10 64 bit) over the weekend and it ran just fine.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 PC
Just noticed that on either my PC or Laptop, I don't see the Show Setting on the bottom of the program. So there are two techniques now for accessing IXT via Lr CC, external editor and scripts. For all intents both the resulting DNG and TIFF are the same. It works great and you end up with DNG named files, if that is a concern. There is an excellent Lr script detailed in DP Review by Patrick Philippot. I have an AMD 6 core processor and Iridient works GREAT! Fast and efficient. PhotoNinja and RPP64 (macOS) can be setup the same way with LR too. So it's basically only a placeholder created during the process.Īnd the additional benefit in doing it this way is because LR originally created the TIFF, that Iridient overwrites, the output from Iridient is already cataloged in LR. The TIFF created by Lightroom is not used, once X-Transformer kicks and picks up the RAW file it overwrites the TIFF created by Lightroom with its own output. Bit like us with Windows based systems oblivious to the Iridient while many enjoyed the program with Apple based systems. I read this in the notes, and I feel for those that have AMD processors. I'm really liking what I'm seeing from everyone else's testing. Hopefully they get it working fine with AMD processors soon. I guess I can do the long route of processing using the laptop to convert but that sucks.Īnd editing on an 11" screen isn't a blast. After doing a bit of research and seeing that it is a known issue I installed on my Intel powered laptop and works fine. My desktop has an AMD processor and it won't run.
I'm a bit disappointed that there is an apparent issue getting this to run on AMD machines. If they do just adjust the workflow for now. This is a beta version, and we should check to see if the DNG files imported directly behave differently than external edited TIFF files. All my comparison shots was a copy of all the RAF Lr settings excluding sharpening/noise reduction.Īccording to Brian in the help notes, there should not be a difference between the DNG and TIFF files, as the TIFF files are just an intermediary step with the way Lr processes shots. I am finding very similar look as compared to the RAF with respect to color when I add the same color profile. The DNG will look flat until you add a color profile. The raw DNG's when I convert I make sure I turn off the "Preserve Lr settings" on tab 2 to make sure I don't add further Lr adjustments. This seems to be consistent with any of the profiles where the LR converted raw is more saturated and the ID one less so.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER FOR WINDOWS 10 PRO
Left is the DNG file that I processed to match the SOOC JPG on the right, didn't use any sharpness only exposure and tone curveĪnyone else notice that the ID dngs are not as saturated compared to the LR? Both of these images have the Pro Neg Std profile applied (granted not the most saturated of profiles but it is relative ok?) The ID image is slightly flatter, less contrasty and a bit less saturated than the LR image.
0 kommentar(er)
